#Spotifree for windows for free#Getting an app that does for free what Spotify expects to be paid for seems unethical. Spotify expects you to become a subscriber to remove the ads. One friend said it’s no different from an ad-blocker in your browser, and he noted that one of the reasons we use ad-blockers is the objectionable content (like the pop music ads on Spotify) that we don’t want to see.Īnother friend said there’s a difference between ad-blocking in the browser and silencing ads in Spotify: “I hate the work of them that turn aside it shall not cleave to me.” Instead of occasional ads for the latest chart-topping album, I get a few seconds of peaceful silence-thanks to Spotifree.īut the presence of bad ads doesn’t justify stealing, and isn’t that what I’m doing when I listen to Spotify’s music while silencing its main source of revenue? I may be one of only a small number of people doing this, but I never bought that argument from Napster afficionados, and I won’t buy it from myself. No more interruptions to Rachmaninoff from pop stars hawking their latest immoralities and inanities. It’s a little app that basically silences the commercials. I like the amazing free-music player Spoti fy, and Spoti free has made it a more enjoyable experience. So here’s one for you, and I really want to see some careful, scripturally informed wisdom here: is it ethical to use Spotifree? You probably try to think more deeply about your biblical faith and its implications than the average pew-sitter, or you’d be watching TV right now. If you read my blog, you’re probably a Christian.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |